Improper communications (also called “ex parte communications”) occur when one (1) party discusses the merits of his case with a judge without the other party’s presence and/or knowledge. Communication means any type of communication, oral, written, by telephone or electronic device, or otherwise.

No matter how small, an improper communication is unfair because it could give the party speaking with the judge an advantage in his case, or it could give the party who is not present a disadvantage. It could also lead to an accusation that the presiding judge favors one (1) party over another.

Only Court personnel are allowed to communicate with a judge about a case. No other persons shall have improper communications with judges or officials of the Wilton Rancheria Courts regarding a pending case until that case is decided.

This rule does not limit communication on administrative matters, such as scheduling of cases, procedural planning, and program administration. (Res. 2021-43; Res. 2020-59; Res. 2020-42 Exh. A)